March 14, 2009

What's the Rush?

I really don't get what the big deal is about Rush Limbaugh's comment.
Liberals have said far, far, far worse things about Bush, but we've heard nary a peep from the Right. Of course, if we did, we would have had the First Amendment shoved down our throats.

(In fact, we've even seen certain liberals even expressed a desire to see Bush fail).

And really, the fact that Obama's Administration actually stooped to acknowledging, much less responding, to Rush's comment says more about Obama than it does Rush. (He's awfully sensitive, for one thing).

Maybe it's because Obama's black. But if that's so... then Racist Racist Racist is what they're being. What the heck ever happened to "I have a dream that... [people will] be judged not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character". Hellooo, sheeple... favoring blacks is not being "color-blind".

March 10, 2009

Just the Facts, 'Bama

In view of President Obama's recent declaration that his administration's policy shall be: " scientific policy based on facts, not ideology" (which is of course patently's nigh on impossible to form policy or conduct research without ideology at the very least guiding its direction... that very phrase itself reeks of ideology), I have decided to forgo my policy of posting items on older news, and instead post this. Here are a few facts for Mr. Obama:

FACT: The textbook, and the Doctor quoted below, both indicate that life begins at conception:
The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology

"Zygote: this cell results from the union of an oocyte and a sperm. A zygote is the beginning of a new human being (i.e., an embryo). Human development begins at fertilization… This highly specialized, totipotent cell marks the beginning of each of us as a unique individual."

Dr. Hymie Gordon (Mayo Clinic):
"By all criteria of modern molecular biology, life is present from the moment of conception."

And I have more textbooks and doctors I can quote as well.

FACT: California state law defines murder as such: (And I don't think other State laws differ that much from California's).

SECTION 187-199

  1. Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being, or a fetus, with malice aforethought.

FACT: Abortion should more properly be called genocide. (Note: I am NOT saying that anyone that supports abortion is racist... just trying to associate abortion with racism).

This incidence of abortion has resulted in a tremendous loss of life. It has been estimated that since 1973 Black women have had about 16 million abortions. Michael Novak had calculated "Since the number of current living Blacks (in the U.S.) is 36 million, the missing 16 million represents an enormous loss, for without abortion, America's Black community would now number 52 million persons. It would be 36 percent larger than it is. Abortion has swept through the Black community like a scythe, cutting down every fourth member."

(The first link is above is the source for my quote).

Somehow I just know Obama's going to conveniently ignore these facts when crafting his ESR/Abortion policy.

One side note on Embryonic Stem-Cell Research: If it's so darned "promising", where's the private/state funding? Helloooo.... if it truly had any merit they would have private and/or state funding up the wazoo. It's just not promising enough to elicit private funding... which suggests a waste of Government dollars, when/if it is decided to fund it with Federal dollars.

(Of course, John Maynard Keynes said that [Government] money wouldn't be wasted even if they were "digging holes in the ground and filling them in", so I guess that's ok).

P.S. Just as an FYI, I will probably be doing good just to post one post a week, so please don't expect many posts in a short period of time. Thanks.

March 7, 2009

First Post!

Wow, first post. I'm not sure I'll be able to write anything important or, stupendous enough for this occasion, but here goes....

Just my two cents on Obama, pre-Presidency... (wonder how many times thats been used)

(I figure I probably better get the older stuff out of the way first).

I seriously doubt that anyone (in the press) was that excited about Bush before he came into office. Frankly, I was probably too little at the time to notice, but I'll bet you could hear the newscasters' sighs.

Worse than that, though, is how much Obama was doing before he was even in office. Working on a stimulus plan, holding press conferences, (complete with an "office of the president-elect" plaque, secret service guys, and everything) etc. If Bush so much as lifted his little pinky before ascending to the office, the press would've been calling for his impeachment. (yeah, I know... and before he was even President!)

A lot of this echoes a column by Ann Coulter.

(Well, ok. Some of it).